Benchmarking deterministic AST equation graph verification vs probabilistic extraction across 1,200 pages of FAA FAR Title 14, EASA CS-25, and MIL-STD-810H technical orders.
FIGURE 01 // ARCHITECTURAL SCHEMATIC // 02
01QUESTION
Can formal semantic equation graphs and cross-document assumption conflict detection achieve 0% hallucination rate in safety-critical aerospace maintenance directives?
Helios aerospace intelligence pipeline running LandingAI ADE parser, multi-document AST equation graphs, and Rust-accelerated assumption conflict detector against 1,200 pages of aerospace regulatory corpora.
05OBSERVATIONS
Extraction precision reached 99.4% on structured engineering tables; the conflict detector successfully flagged 14 contradictory ambient temperature limits between FAA Part 25 and MIL-STD-810H environmental test procedures.
06FAILURES / LIMITATIONS
AST parser misassociated footnote conditions on legacy multi-column scanned PDF schematics where OCR failed to preserve hierarchical indentation boundaries.
07ITERATION
09 pipeline builds across 500-question aerospace benchmark suite.
08NEXT QUESTION
Can vision-language layout graphs preserve sub-clause inheritance across folded multi-page schematic blueprints?
